Darwin Selected; Creationists Adapt
May 4th, 2007The expense and backlash from the Dover, PA court case seems to have scared creation science advocates away from public education, at least for now. The National Center for Science Education, which defends evolution as the foundation of biological science, maintains a list of news stories on local controversies. A review of their web site shows the trend.
* The Board of Education in Cobb County, GA voted in 2002 to put stickers into science textbooks that described evolution as “a theory, not a fact.” Parents filed suit to remove the stickers; the case was decided in their favor in January 2005 but then remanded for retrial. Twenty thousand stickers were scraped off with razor blades, and everyone elected to the county board in July 2006 went on record as opposing them. The case was settled out of court in December 2006 with the School Board agreeing permanently not to take any action that “would prevent or hinder the teaching of evolution.”
* The Ohio State Board of Education adopted state science standards that were critical of evolution in 2002. The ensuing fight was settled in 2006, when the Board fixed the standard and dissolved a committee that had been considering further revisions. Voters added an exclamation point in the 2006 elections, when four Board seats and the Governorship went to candidates who rejected creationism as science.
* The Kansas State Board of Education adopted standards in November 2005 that misrepresented evolution as scientifically controversial. After intense criticism, they reversed the decision in February 2007.
* Anti-evolution bills were defeated in the Florida Legislature in May 2005, the Utah Legislature in February 2006, and the Alabama legislature in April 2006.
The few Creationist proposals that remain active in state legislatures now have a different tone. South Carolina legislators are considering a bill that would require instructional materials to “emphasize critical thinking and analysis in each content area.” A citizens’ group called South Carolinians for Science Education opposes the bill because its sponsor, Rep. Robert Walker (R-Spartanburg), is an avowed creationist. The group suspects that if Walker prevails, he would use the law to make another run at the state standards.
In Tennessee, state senator Raymond Finney (R-Maryville) introduced a resolution in February 2007 that would formally ask the State Education Commissioner whether the universe “has been created or has merely happened by random, unplanned, and purposeless occurrences.” When he introduced the bill, Finney said that his long-term goal was to bring creationism to science classes. But a month later he said, “I’m not sure I’m going forward with that . . . I probably made a mistake in approaching it from a creation aspect. People get so sensitive about whether children might be exposed to any sort of religious thing.”
“Creationists aren’t going away,” said Dave Thomas, President of New Mexicans for Science and Reason. “They’re just getting sneakier.”





